We have catalogued and verified over 25,000 high-quality suppliers' fleets and capabilities for commercial and civil construction, including dozer hire, so you can search our database and find a dozer (and operator) to mobilise to your job site quickly.īelow we cover guides on dozer hire rates, types of dozers and common sizes of tracked dozers to help you best choose what dozer you need to hire.ĭozer hire rates vary greatly depending on whether the machine has modern onboard technology such as telematics and GPS, but an older dozer can still be effective in heavy-duty work and may cost less to hire. Sorry if I put you off, just wanted to highlight a bit of what I've found to be their strengths and weaknesses.Iseekplant is Australia's largest online marketplace for civil and commercial construction hire, supply and services companies. CTL's suffer the same issue when you have a jockey in the cab rather than an operator.īy the way, good luck trying to hire a CTL in the UK. Operate them properly and the track costs aren't over the top. Gets my goat watching an excavator and dump truck stripping a site, taking two guys to take twice as long to do the job as one Drott.Īs for the track costs, that's down to people spinning them on the spot instead of learning to operate them properly, not spinning the tracks and steering them progressively. Spreading material, they are fast and easy to operate.Ī lot of what killed Drotts were lack of operators, site agents phoning for a 360 for every job whether it's the best machine for the job or not, and guidance systems on dozers allowing them to grade sub base and type one, which was a traditional drott job. Also, although these new machines have better dump height than you expect, they have very little reach if you're loading a tipper, and you sit lower and further forward. ![]() You just have to accept that a CTL build quality has as much in common with an old Drott as Freelander has with a series Land Rover. Like any machine, they're not rubbish on the right job. ![]() They're a machine that if you lay out the shillings you need to keep them working. Unless you need to run any high flow attachment like a mulcher, there's no advantage of a 299 over 289, in fact the 289 has a slightly stiffer frame and is a bit lighter. Don't think any of these machines (talking Cat here, as I've only spent limited time on Bobcat) will stack to even an old 100B, they'll load loose material quicker, spread and grade quicker, but in a heavy dig the frames flex, they lack the breakout, the pins are much smaller than an old drott, and spinning the tracks will kill them quicker than you can say Overdraft. You can lengthen sprocket life by swapping sided for side. However, with the CTL machines the picture is rosier, you can get about 2000 hrs out of the tracks, and at that there's still life left in the rollers. ![]() For example a 257 complete undercarriage replacement is over £12,000, and you don't get to just change the tracks as generally when the tracks are shagged so are the rollers and sprockets, and on earth work that's around 1000 hrs. Skip the 2*7 models, they're MTL machines and other than for mowing lawns the tracks are killers - you'd spend less on undercarriage per hour running a D11. I've spent quite a lot of time on 289's and 299's. There were never many 939's over here, they came out just as small Drotts were falling out of use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |